Brandinium

Trademark search for:

SPARKLY CHARKALEE PRODUCTIONS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2016-07-12 — Application filed
  • 2016-07-18 — Application filed
  • 2016-10-22 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2016-10-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-10-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-10-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-10-25 — Office action issued
  • 2016-10-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-10-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-10-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2016-11-10 — Assigned to lie
  • 2016-11-16 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2016-11-30 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2016-12-20 — Published for opposition
  • 2016-12-20 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2017-02-14 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2017-04-25 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2017-04-25 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2017-08-04 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2017-08-04 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2017-08-04 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2017-08-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2017-08-08 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2017-09-27 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2017-12-06 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2018-02-14 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2018-02-14 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2018-02-14 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2018-02-16 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2018-08-14 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2018-08-27 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2018-08-27 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2018-08-27 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2018-08-27 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2018-08-28 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
  • 2018-08-28 — Petition to revive-received
  • 2018-09-19 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2018-10-11 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2018-10-15 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2018-10-18 — Incomplete petition notice mailed
  • 2018-11-18 — Teas response to petition deficiency received
  • 2018-11-18 — Use amendment filed
  • 2018-12-06 — Petition granted - sou filed
  • 2018-12-06 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
  • 2019-01-29 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2019-01-29 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2019-01-30 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2019-02-19 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2019-02-20 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2019-03-26 — Registered-principal register
  • 2019-05-06 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received
  • 2019-05-06 — Withdrawal of attorney granted
  • 2021-05-03 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2021-05-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-05-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-05-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-05-03 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2024-03-26 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2025-10-10 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2025-10-10 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

PADMA SHERNI INC.
Hockessin , DE
PADMA SHERNI INC.
NEWARK , DE
SPARKLY CHARKALEE PHRONESIS INC.
HOCKESSIN , DE
PADMA SHERNI INC.
NEWARK , DE
Sparkly Charkalee Phronesis Inc.
Hockessin , DE
Sparkly Charkalee Phronesis Inc.
Hockessin , DE

Correspondent

Thomas Dunlap Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig, PLLC
211 Church Street SE
Leesburg, VA 20175
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2016-07-12
Status Date:
2025-10-10
Filing Year:
2016

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.