Brandinium

Trademark search for:

UNITED MEDTEC

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2016-01-18 — Application filed
  • 2016-03-24 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
  • 2016-03-25 — Application filed
  • 2016-03-28 — Application filed
  • 2016-04-01 — Application filed
  • 2016-05-03 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2016-05-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-05-12 — Office action issued
  • 2016-05-13 — Office action issued
  • 2016-05-13 — Office action issued
  • 2016-07-16 — Office action issued
  • 2016-11-10 — Limitation of goods received from ib
  • 2016-11-11 — Office action issued
  • 2016-11-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-11-11 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-11-17 — Limitation from the ib - request exam review
  • 2016-12-03 — Office action issued
  • 2016-12-05 — Office action issued
  • 2017-02-28 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2017-02-28 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2017-04-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2017-04-24 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2017-04-24 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2017-04-24 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2017-04-24 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2017-05-15 — Assigned to lie
  • 2017-05-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2017-05-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2017-05-16 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2017-05-16 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2017-05-16 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2017-06-12 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2017-06-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2017-06-29 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2017-07-07 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2017-07-26 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2017-07-26 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2017-07-26 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
  • 2017-08-11 — Notification processed by ib
  • 2017-08-15 — Published for opposition
  • 2017-08-15 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2017-08-30 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
  • 2017-08-30 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2017-09-15 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
  • 2017-10-31 — Registered-principal register
  • 2018-01-31 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-02-01 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-02-01 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-03-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2019-02-01 — New representative at ib received
  • 2019-04-19 — New representative at ib received
  • 2022-10-31 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2023-05-19 — New representative at ib received
  • 2024-04-12 — New representative at ib received
  • 2024-05-17 — Cancelled section 71
  • 2024-05-17 — Final status recorded
  • 2024-06-07 — New representative at ib received
  • 2025-01-16 — Change of name/address rec'd from ib
  • 2025-01-18 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
  • 2025-04-02 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
  • 2025-04-02 — Invalidation processed
  • 2025-04-19 — Total invalidation processed by the ib

Owner Information

United MedTec Holding GmbH
DE
United MedTec Holding GmbH
31675 Bückeburg DE
United MedTec Holding GmbH
31675 Bückeburg DE
United MedTec Holding GmbH
31675 Bückeburg DE

Correspondent

WILLIAM C WRIGHT EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP
60 EAST 42ND STREET SUITE 2520
NEW YORK, NY 10165
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2016-01-18
Status Date:
2024-05-17
Filing Year:
2016

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.