Trademark search for:

VAPZ STIX N' THE 6

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2016-12-11 — Application filed
2016-12-14 — Application filed
2016-12-15 — Application filed
2016-12-16 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2017-03-14 — Assigned to examiner
2017-03-16 — Final disposition recorded
2017-03-16 — Final disposition recorded
2017-03-16 — Final disposition recorded
2017-03-20 — Undeliverable mail - courtesy copy mailed
2017-06-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-07-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-09-12 — Office action issued
2017-09-17 — Assigned to lie
2017-09-19 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2017-09-19 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2017-09-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-09-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-09-22 — Suspension letter written
2017-09-22 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-09-22 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2018-04-04 — Assigned to lie
2018-04-05 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2018-04-12 — Suspension inquiry written
2018-04-12 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2018-04-12 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2018-11-13 — Application abandoned
2018-11-13 — Application abandoned
2018-11-13 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Vapz, Inc.
Vaughan, Ontario CA

Correspondent

PAUL R. FRANSWAY Dickinson Wright PLLC
350 S. Main; Suite 300
ANN ARBOR, MI 48104
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2016-12-11

Status Date:
2018-11-13

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2016

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.