Trademark search for:

BLOCK BUSTER CONTACTS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2017-03-31 — Application filed
2017-04-04 — Application filed
2017-04-06 — Application filed
2017-06-23 — Assigned to examiner
2017-06-24 — Final disposition recorded
2017-06-24 — Final disposition recorded
2017-06-24 — Final disposition recorded
2017-06-28 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2017-06-28 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2017-06-28 — Examiners amendment -written
2017-06-28 — Examiner's amendment entered
2017-06-28 — Approved for pub - principal register
2017-08-02 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2017-08-22 — Published for opposition
2017-08-22 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-10-17 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2018-04-17 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2018-05-21 — Application abandoned
2018-05-21 — Application abandoned
2018-06-06 — Teas petition to revive received
2018-06-06 — Petition to revive-granted
2018-06-06 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2018-07-10 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2018-07-10 — New noa to issue
2018-08-21 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2019-03-25 — Application abandoned
2019-03-25 — Application abandoned
2019-03-25 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

RICHARD FARMER
NEW YORK , NY

RICHARD FARMER
NEW YORK , NY

Correspondent

RICHARD FARMER BLOCK BUSTER CONTACTS
168-20 JAMAICA AVENUE FL.2
168-20 JAMAICA AVENUE FL.2
NEW YORK, NY 11432

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2017-03-31

Status Date:
2019-03-25

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2017

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.