Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CGL TECHNOLOGIES

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2017-08-07 — Application filed
  • 2017-08-10 — Application filed
  • 2017-08-10 — Application filed
  • 2017-08-11 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
  • 2017-10-31 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2017-11-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2017-11-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2017-11-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-04-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-04-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2018-04-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2018-04-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-04-25 — Office action issued
  • 2018-04-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-04-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-05-09 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2018-05-09 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2018-05-09 — Suspension letter written
  • 2018-05-14 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2018-05-21 — Assigned to lie
  • 2018-05-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-05-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-05-30 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2018-05-30 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2018-05-30 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2018-05-30 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2018-05-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2018-06-13 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2018-07-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-07-03 — Published for opposition
  • 2018-07-03 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2018-08-28 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2019-02-19 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2019-02-19 — Teas request to divide received
  • 2019-02-19 — Divisional request received
  • 2019-02-19 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2019-03-19 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2019-03-19 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2019-03-19 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2019-03-20 — Corrected noa e-mailed
  • 2019-03-20 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2019-08-21 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2019-08-21 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2019-08-21 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2019-08-23 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2020-02-18 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2020-02-18 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2020-02-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-02-24 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2020-02-25 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2020-08-28 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2020-08-28 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2020-08-28 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2020-09-01 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2021-03-01 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2021-04-05 — Application abandoned
  • 2021-04-05 — Application abandoned
  • 2021-04-06 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2021-04-06 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2021-04-06 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2021-04-06 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
  • 2021-04-08 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2021-04-09 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2021-10-04 — Application abandoned
  • 2021-10-04 — Application abandoned
  • 2021-10-04 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

CGL Technologies LLC
Westwood , MA
CGL Technologies LLC
Westwood , MA

Correspondent

Christopher G. Lang Lang Coakley LLC
1842 Centre Street
West Roxbury, MA 02132
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2017-08-07
Status Date:
2021-10-04
Filing Year:
2017

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.