Brandinium

Trademark search for:

KIPQ

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2017-03-27 — Application filed
  • 2017-03-30 — Application filed
  • 2017-03-30 — Application filed
  • 2017-03-31 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
  • 2017-06-20 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2017-06-26 — Hidden sensitive content
  • 2017-06-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2017-06-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2017-06-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2017-12-12 — Office action issued
  • 2017-12-12 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2017-12-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-01-02 — Office action issued
  • 2018-01-02 — Office action issued
  • 2018-01-02 — Office action issued
  • 2018-02-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-02-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-02-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-03-05 — Office action issued
  • 2018-03-16 — Assigned to lie
  • 2018-03-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-03-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-03-29 — Office action issued
  • 2018-03-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-03-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-05-23 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2018-05-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-05-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-05-24 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
  • 2018-05-24 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
  • 2018-05-24 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
  • 2018-06-20 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2018-06-20 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-06-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-06-28 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
  • 2018-06-28 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
  • 2018-06-28 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
  • 2018-09-09 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2018-09-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-09-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-09-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-09-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-09-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-09-22 — Office action issued
  • 2018-09-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-09-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-09-25 — Office action issued
  • 2018-09-25 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
  • 2018-09-25 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
  • 2018-10-19 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2018-10-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-10-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-11-13 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
  • 2018-11-13 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
  • 2018-11-13 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
  • 2018-11-30 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2018-11-30 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-11-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-12-21 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
  • 2018-12-21 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
  • 2018-12-21 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
  • 2018-12-27 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2018-12-27 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-12-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2019-01-19 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
  • 2019-01-19 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
  • 2019-01-19 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
  • 2019-01-27 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2019-01-27 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2019-01-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2019-01-31 — Data modification completed
  • 2019-02-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2019-02-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2019-02-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2019-04-15 — Office action issued
  • 2019-04-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2019-04-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2019-04-23 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2019-05-20 — Office action issued
  • 2019-05-20 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
  • 2019-05-20 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
  • 2019-06-18 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2019-06-18 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2019-06-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2019-06-27 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
  • 2019-06-27 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
  • 2019-06-27 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
  • 2019-07-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2019-07-21 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2019-07-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2019-08-14 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
  • 2019-08-14 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
  • 2019-08-14 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
  • 2020-02-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2020-02-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2020-02-25 — Application abandoned
  • 2020-02-25 — Final status recorded
  • 2020-02-26 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

Fang Bo
ShenZhen CN

Correspondent

CITUS TECHNOLOGY LLC
8 THE GREEN SUITE #5538
DOVER, DE 19901
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2017-03-27
Status Date:
2020-02-25
Filing Year:
2017

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.