Trademark search for:

COMMON LUXURY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2018-06-14 — Application filed
2018-06-18 — Application filed
2018-06-20 — Application filed
2018-10-02 — Assigned to examiner
2018-10-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
2018-10-24 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2018-11-13 — Published for opposition
2018-11-13 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2019-01-08 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2019-07-01 — Sou teas extension received
2019-07-01 — Sou extension 1 filed
2019-07-01 — Sou extension 1 granted
2019-07-03 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2020-01-08 — Sou teas extension received
2020-01-08 — Sou extension 2 filed
2020-01-08 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2020-01-14 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2020-01-14 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2020-01-14 — Sou extension 2 granted
2020-01-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2020-07-06 — Sou teas extension received
2020-07-06 — Sou extension 3 filed
2020-07-06 — Sou extension 3 granted
2020-07-08 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2021-02-08 — Application abandoned
2021-02-08 — Application abandoned
2021-02-08 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Common Luxury LLC
Venice , CA

Common Luxury LLC
Venice , CA

Correspondent

Daniel J. Schacht DONAHUE FITZGERALD LLP
1999 HARRISON STREET
26TH FLOOR
OAKLAND, CA 94612

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2018-06-14

Status Date:
2021-02-08

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2018

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.