Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2018 ›
SC ›
SCREENPAD
Trademark search for:
SCREENPAD
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2018-01-05 — Application filed
2018-01-09 — Application filed
2018-01-19 — Application filed
2018-04-16 — Assigned to examiner
2018-04-19 — Final disposition recorded
2018-04-19 — Final disposition recorded
2018-04-19 — Final disposition recorded
2018-10-18 — Office action issued
2018-10-30 — Assigned to lie
2018-10-31 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-10-31 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-11-21 — Suspension letter written
2018-11-21 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2018-11-21 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2019-06-13 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2019-06-28 — Suspension inquiry written
2019-06-28 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2019-06-28 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2019-12-30 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2020-01-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2020-01-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2020-01-17 — Suspension letter written
2020-01-17 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2020-01-17 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2020-08-04 — Assigned to lie
2020-08-06 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2020-08-17 — Suspension inquiry written
2020-08-17 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2020-08-17 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2021-02-17 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2021-02-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2021-02-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2021-03-10 — Suspension letter written
2021-03-10 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2021-03-10 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2021-09-29 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2021-10-01 — Suspension inquiry written
2021-10-01 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2021-10-01 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2022-03-25 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2022-03-31 — Correspondence received in law office
2022-03-31 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2022-04-01 — Suspension letter written
2022-04-01 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2022-04-01 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2022-11-18 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2022-11-22 — Suspension inquiry written
2022-11-22 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2022-11-22 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2022-12-23 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2022-12-23 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2022-12-23 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
2022-12-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
2022-12-28 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2022-12-28 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2022-12-28 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
2022-12-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
2023-05-10 — Teas amendment of use received
2023-05-11 — Use amendment filed
2023-05-11 — Amendment to use processing complete
2023-06-05 — Use amendment accepted
2023-06-05 — Final disposition recorded
2023-06-05 — Final disposition recorded
2023-06-05 — Final disposition recorded
2023-06-06 — Notice of acceptance of amendment to allege use e-mailed
2023-09-20 — Application abandoned
2023-09-20 — Application abandoned
2023-09-20 — Application abandoned
2023-09-20 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
ASUSTEK COMPUTER CORPORATION
TAIPEI TW
Correspondent
Joe McKinney Muncy MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C. 125 S. Royal Street Alexandria, VA 22314 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2018-01-05
Status Date:
2023-09-20
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.