Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2019 ›
SC ›
SCARY DELICIOUS
Trademark search for:
SCARY DELICIOUS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2019-05-09 — Application filed
2019-05-13 — Application filed
2019-05-29 — Application filed
2019-07-24 — Assigned to examiner
2019-07-29 — Examiners amendment -written
2019-07-29 — Suspension letter written
2019-07-29 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2019-07-29 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2019-07-29 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2019-07-29 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2019-07-29 — Examiner's amendment entered
2020-02-13 — Assigned to lie
2020-02-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2020-08-31 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2020-09-02 — Suspension inquiry written
2020-09-02 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2020-09-02 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2021-02-26 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-02-26 — Teas change of owner address received
2021-02-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-02-26 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2021-02-26 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-02-26 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2021-03-02 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2021-03-04 — Suspension letter written
2021-03-04 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2021-03-04 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2021-03-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2021-03-04 — Correspondence received in law office
2021-09-27 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2021-09-28 — Suspension inquiry written
2021-09-28 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2021-09-28 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2022-03-28 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2022-03-31 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2022-03-31 — Correspondence received in law office
2022-04-06 — Suspension letter written
2022-04-06 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2022-04-06 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2022-04-22 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2022-04-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
2022-04-22 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2022-04-22 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2022-11-18 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2022-11-30 — Suspension inquiry written
2022-11-30 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2022-11-30 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2023-02-09 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2023-02-09 — Teas change of owner address received
2023-02-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
2023-02-09 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2023-02-09 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2023-02-15 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2023-05-11 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2024-01-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2024-01-26 — Assigned to lie
2024-01-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2024-02-08 — Suspension letter written
2024-02-08 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2024-02-08 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2024-09-10 — Suspension inquiry written
2024-09-10 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2024-09-10 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2024-09-17 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2024-12-27 — Application abandoned
2024-12-27 — Application abandoned
2024-12-27 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
JOEY DREW STUDIOS INC.
KINDLY BEAST INC.
Correspondent
Patrick J. Koncel Perkins Coie LLP
Filing Details
Filing Date:
Status Date:
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.
