Trademark search for:

THOUGHTS OF A PRAYING MAN

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2020-10-27 — Application filed
2020-10-30 — Application filed
2020-12-17 — Application filed
2021-03-26 — Assigned to examiner
2021-04-01 — Final disposition recorded
2021-04-01 — Final disposition recorded
2021-04-01 — Final disposition recorded
2021-07-26 — Office action issued
2021-07-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2021-07-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2021-09-14 — Office action issued
2021-09-14 — Office action issued
2021-09-14 — Office action issued
2022-03-15 — Final disposition recorded
2022-03-15 — Office action issued
2022-03-15 — Final disposition recorded
2022-03-15 — Final disposition recorded
2022-03-17 — Assigned to lie
2022-03-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2022-03-18 — Correspondence received in law office
2022-04-19 — Final disposition recorded
2022-04-19 — Final disposition recorded
2022-04-19 — Office action issued
2022-11-01 — Notice of unresponsive amendment - e-mailed
2022-11-01 — Notification of notice of unresponsive amendment - e-mailed
2022-11-01 — Report unresponsive amendment - completed
2022-12-01 — Application abandoned
2022-12-01 — Application abandoned
2022-12-01 — Application abandoned
2022-12-01 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Walls, Curtis M
Charlotte , NC

Correspondent

Walls, Curtis M
4905 Benthaven Ln
Charlotte, NC 28269
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2020-10-27

Status Date:
2022-12-01

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2020

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.