Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2020 ›
WE ›
WEPAY A CHASE COMPANY
Trademark search for:
WEPAY A CHASE COMPANY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2020-01-22 — Application filed
2020-01-25 — Application filed
2020-01-26 — Application filed
2020-01-28 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
2020-04-10 — Assigned to examiner
2020-04-22 — Final disposition recorded
2020-04-22 — Final disposition recorded
2020-04-22 — Final disposition recorded
2020-10-21 — Office action issued
2020-10-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2020-10-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2020-11-09 — Suspension letter written
2020-11-09 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2020-11-09 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2020-11-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
2020-11-13 — On hold - electronic record review required
2020-11-18 — Electronic record review complete
2020-12-01 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2021-01-11 — Examiners amendment -written
2021-01-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
2021-01-11 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2021-01-11 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2021-01-11 — Examiner's amendment entered
2021-01-11 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2021-01-26 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2021-02-05 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2021-02-25 — Examiners amendment -written
2021-02-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
2021-02-25 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2021-02-25 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2021-02-25 — Examiner's amendment entered
2021-03-01 — Assigned to lie
2021-03-01 — Law office publication review completed
2021-03-17 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2021-04-06 — Published for opposition
2021-04-06 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2021-06-01 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2021-07-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-07-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-07-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-09-29 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2021-09-29 — Case returned to examination
2021-11-09 — Suspension letter written
2021-11-09 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2021-11-09 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2021-11-09 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2022-06-08 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2022-06-27 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2022-08-01 — Suspension inquiry written
2022-08-01 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2022-08-01 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2023-01-24 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2023-01-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2023-01-30 — Assigned to lie
2023-01-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2023-02-28 — Suspension letter written
2023-02-28 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2023-02-28 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2023-09-12 — Suspension letter written
2023-09-12 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2023-09-12 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2024-03-15 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2024-03-25 — Suspension inquiry written
2024-03-25 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2024-03-25 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2024-07-09 — Application abandoned
2024-07-09 — Application abandoned
2024-07-09 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
WePay, Inc.
Redwood City , CA
WePay, Inc.
Redwood City , CA
Correspondent
Susan Neuberger Weller MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C 555 12th Street NW, Suite 1100 WASHINGTON, DC 20004 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2020-01-22
Status Date:
2024-07-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.