Trademark search for:

TAPNPAY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2023-06-29 — Application filed
2023-07-03 — Application filed
2023-08-01 — Application filed
2023-09-12 — Assigned to examiner
2023-09-21 — Final disposition recorded
2023-09-21 — Final disposition recorded
2023-09-21 — Final disposition recorded
2023-12-20 — Application filed
2023-12-20 — Application filed
2024-03-20 — Office action issued
2024-03-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2024-03-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2024-04-02 — Suspension letter written
2024-04-02 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2024-04-02 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2025-01-23 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2025-05-13 — Final disposition recorded
2025-05-13 — Final disposition recorded
2025-05-13 — Final disposition recorded
2025-08-27 — Application abandoned
2025-08-27 — Application abandoned
2025-08-27 — Final status recorded
2025-12-08 — Teas change of owner address received
2025-12-08 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2025-12-08 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2025-12-08 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2025-12-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
2025-12-08 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains

Owner Information

Neology, Inc.
Carlsbad , CA

Correspondent

Farah P. Bhatti Buchalter, A Profession Corporation
18400 VON KARMAN AVE, SUITE 800
Irvine, CA 92612
United States

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2023-06-29

Status Date:
2025-08-27

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2023

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.