Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2023 ›
UN ›
UNIVERSAL CABINET IMMERSION TECHNOLOGY
Trademark search for:
UNIVERSAL CABINET IMMERSION TECHNOLOGY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2023-10-04 — Application filed
2023-10-07 — Application filed
2023-10-13 — Application filed
2023-10-25 — Assigned to examiner
2023-11-02 — Final disposition recorded
2023-11-02 — Final disposition recorded
2023-11-02 — Final disposition recorded
2024-02-02 — Application filed
2024-02-02 — Application filed
2024-05-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2024-05-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2024-05-02 — Office action issued
2024-05-02 — Office action issued
2024-06-04 — Office action issued
2024-06-04 — Office action issued
2024-06-04 — Office action issued
2024-08-28 — Application filed
2024-08-28 — Application filed
2024-12-04 — Correspondence received in law office
2024-12-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2024-12-04 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2024-12-05 — Application abandoned
2025-01-08 — Application abandoned
2025-01-08 — Final status recorded
2025-08-29 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2025-08-29 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2025-08-29 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2025-08-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
Owner Information
Interblock d.o.o.
Las Vegas , NV
Correspondent
Tim D. Chheda Selman Munson & Lerner 9821 Katy Freeway, Ste. 875 Ste. 875 Houston, TX 77024
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2023-10-04
Status Date:
2025-01-08
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.