Trademark search for:

PYROMEX

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1981-04-30 — Application filed
1981-12-01 — Published for opposition
1982-02-23 — Registered-principal register
1987-06-30 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1988-03-09 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2002-01-16 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2002-03-08 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 9
2002-03-22 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2002-03-22 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2008-03-21 — Case file in ticrs
2012-01-26 — Teas change of owner address received
2012-01-26 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2012-01-26 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2012-01-27 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
2012-01-27 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2012-01-27 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
2021-02-23 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2022-01-12 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2022-09-02 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2022-09-02 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

TEIJIN KABUSHIKI KAISHA (TEIJIN LIMITED)
KITA-KU, OSAKA JP

Toho Tenax Co., Ltd.
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo JP

Toho Rayon Co., Ltd.
Chuo-ku, Tokyo JP

Toho Rayon Co., Ltd.
Chuo-ku, Tokyo JP

Toho Rayon Co., Ltd.
Chuo-ku, Tokyo JP

Correspondent

GARY D. KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.
WASHINGTON, DC 20037
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1981-04-30

Status Date:
2022-09-02

Category:
Fabrics

Filing Year:
1981

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.