Brandinium

Trademark search for:

TEE SHEET

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1996-09-12 — Application filed
  • 1996-11-27 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1996-12-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 1997-06-11 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 1997-06-30 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 1997-09-29 — Use amendment filed
  • 1997-09-29 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 1997-09-29 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 1998-01-23 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 1998-02-03 — Amendment to use processing complete
  • 1998-03-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 1998-06-24 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 1998-07-17 — Use amendment accepted
  • 1998-07-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 1998-09-04 — Notice of publication
  • 1998-10-06 — Published for opposition
  • 1998-11-09 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 1999-03-15 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
  • 2000-02-03 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
  • 2000-02-03 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
  • 2000-03-28 — Registered-principal register
  • 2006-03-17 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-04-21 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2006-12-30 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2006-12-30 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Marimac Inc.
LaChine, Quebec, H8T 1A3 CA
Marimac Inc.
LaChine, Quebec, H8T 1A3 CA
Marimac Inc.
LaChine, Quebec, H8T 1A3 CA

Correspondent

JAY BEGLER NIXON PEABODY LLP
27TH FL
2 EMBARCADERO CTR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1996-09-12
Status Date:
2006-12-30
Category:
Fabrics
Filing Year:
1996

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.