Brandinium

Trademark search for:

ASHFORD COURT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2000-08-04 — Application filed
  • 2001-02-01 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2001-02-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2001-09-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2001-09-29 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-01-30 — Notice of publication
  • 2002-02-19 — Published for opposition
  • 2002-03-26 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2002-05-08 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
  • 2002-11-30 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
  • 2002-11-30 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
  • 2003-06-17 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2003-12-17 — Use amendment filed
  • 2003-12-19 — Paper received
  • 2003-12-19 — Divisional request received
  • 2004-03-17 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2004-03-17 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2004-04-09 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2004-06-15 — Registered-principal register
  • 2009-03-20 — Cancellation instituted no. 999999
  • 2009-08-24 — Cancellation granted no. 999999
  • 2009-09-02 — Cancellation terminated no. 999999
  • 2009-09-02 — Cancelled section 18-total
  • 2009-09-02 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Baron Industries, LLC
Richmond , VA
Baron Industries, LLC
Richmond , VA
Baron Industries, LLC
Richmond , VA

Correspondent

Baron Industries, LLC
4719 Jefferson Davis Highway
Richmond, VA 23234
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2000-08-04
Status Date:
2009-09-02
Category:
Fabrics
Filing Year:
2000

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.