Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Fabrics ›
2000 ›
PR ›
PROVISCOSE
Trademark search for:
PROVISCOSE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2000-03-15 — Application filed
2000-06-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2000-08-24 — Assigned to examiner
2000-08-28 — Final disposition recorded
2001-02-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-08-27 — Office action issued
2002-02-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-03-15 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2002-03-15 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2002-10-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-04-10 — Paper received
2003-04-16 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2003-04-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-05-27 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2003-06-09 — Examiners amendment mailed
2003-06-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-07-30 — Notice of publication
2003-08-19 — Published for opposition
2003-11-11 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2004-02-11 — Fax received
2004-02-11 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
2004-03-03 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2004-04-20 — Registered-principal register
2004-05-05 — Exparte appeal terminated
2007-05-25 — Case file in ticrs
2010-06-02 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2010-06-19 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2010-06-19 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2014-02-26 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2014-02-26 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2014-03-18 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2014-03-18 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2014-03-18 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2014-03-18 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
2017-04-19 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2017-04-19 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2018-12-15 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2018-12-15 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2020-03-28 — Teas change of owner address received
2020-03-28 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2020-03-28 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2020-03-28 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
2020-03-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
2020-03-28 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2020-05-27 — Review of correspondence complete - address updated
2021-08-23 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-08-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-08-23 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-08-23 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
2021-08-31 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-08-31 — Teas change of owner address received
2021-08-31 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-08-31 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-08-31 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2022-02-09 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2022-02-09 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
2022-02-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
2022-02-09 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2023-04-20 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2024-11-01 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2024-11-01 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Lenzing Aktiengesellschaft
A-4860 Lenzing AT
Lenzing Aktiengesellschaft
A-4860 Lenzing AT
Lenzing Aktiengesellschaft
A-4860 Lenzing AT
Correspondent
Danielle I. Mattessich Merchant & Gould P.C. P.O. Box 2910 Minneapolis, MN 55402 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2000-03-15
Status Date:
2024-11-01
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.