Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Fabrics ›
2003 ›
XO ›
XOFF-TECH
Trademark search for:
XOFF-TECH
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-06-20 — Application filed
2003-12-29 — Assigned to examiner
2004-01-08 — Final disposition recorded
2004-04-21 — Paper received
2004-04-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-05-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-07-07 — Notice of publication
2004-07-27 — Published for opposition
2004-10-19 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-04-18 — Sou teas extension received
2005-04-18 — Sou extension 1 filed
2005-04-18 — Sou extension 1 granted
2005-10-17 — Sou teas extension received
2005-10-17 — Sou extension 2 filed
2005-11-01 — Sou extension 2 granted
2006-04-19 — Sou teas extension received
2006-04-19 — Sou extension 3 filed
2006-05-02 — Sou extension 3 granted
2006-10-18 — Sou extension 4 filed
2006-10-20 — Paper received
2006-10-20 — Divisional request received
2006-11-08 — Divisional processing complete
2006-11-09 — Sou extension 4 granted
2007-04-10 — Sou teas extension received
2007-04-10 — Sou extension 5 filed
2007-04-10 — Sou extension 5 granted
2007-10-22 — Final status recorded
2007-12-18 — Application abandoned
2007-12-18 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Nan Yang Fabric Co., Ltd.
Petchaburi, Province 76140 TH
Nan Yang Fabric Co., Ltd.
Petchaburi, Province 76140 TH
Correspondent
SUJATA CHAUDHN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC 1133 AVE OF THE AMERICAS NEW YORK, NY 10036-6799 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-06-20
Status Date:
2007-10-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.