Brandinium

Trademark search for:

PAN PACIFIC LOTUS LUXURY COLLECTION

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-10-29 — Application filed
  • 2004-11-08 — Application filed
  • 2005-06-06 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-06-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-06-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-12-12 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2005-12-13 — Office action issued
  • 2005-12-13 — Office action issued
  • 2005-12-13 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-01-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-01-18 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-01-18 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2006-07-21 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-02-02 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-02-02 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-10-11 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-04-11 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-10-16 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-10-16 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-04-16 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-11-20 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2010-05-21 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2010-06-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-06-05 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-07-13 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-07-13 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-09-28 — Registered-principal register
  • 2015-09-28 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2016-03-09 — Teas section 7 request received
  • 2016-03-09 — Sec 7 request filed
  • 2016-03-09 — Sec 7 request filed
  • 2016-03-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2016-03-14 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) filed
  • 2016-03-14 — Teas section 8 received
  • 2016-03-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2016-03-15 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2016-03-15 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2016-03-31 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2016-05-24 — Amendment under section 7 - processed
  • 2016-05-24 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8
  • 2016-06-04 — Otqr withdrawal from publication
  • 2016-06-09 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 7
  • 2016-06-27 — Office action issued
  • 2016-09-12 — Amendment under section 7 - processed
  • 2016-09-12 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
  • 2016-09-12 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
  • 2016-09-26 — Otqr withdrawal from publication
  • 2016-10-12 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2016-10-12 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 7
  • 2016-12-30 — Office action issued
  • 2017-02-17 — Post registration action correction
  • 2017-03-01 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 7
  • 2017-03-20 — Teas section 7 request received
  • 2017-03-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2017-04-11 — Amendment under section 7 - processed
  • 2017-07-26 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2019-09-28 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2021-04-30 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2021-04-30 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

PAN PACIFIC LOTUS
PORTLAND , OR
Pan Im-Ex Pacific, Inc.
Portland , OR
Pan Im-Ex Pacific, Inc.
Portland , OR
Pan Im-Ex Pacific, Inc.
Portland , OR

Correspondent

Beth Hutchens
522 SW 5th Ave, Suite 1390
PORTLAND, OR 97205-3310
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-10-29
Status Date:
2021-04-30
Category:
Fabrics
Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.