Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Fabrics ›
2005 ›
MI ›
MIND MF FETISH
Trademark search for:
MIND MF FETISH
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-12-13 — Application filed
2005-12-19 — Application filed
2005-12-20 — Notice of design search code mailed
2006-06-13 — Suspension letter written
2006-06-13 — Assigned to examiner
2006-06-13 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2007-01-04 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-07-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-07-06 — Assigned to lie
2007-07-06 — Assigned to lie
2008-01-07 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2008-01-07 — Assigned to lie
2008-07-09 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2009-01-13 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2009-07-13 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2010-01-13 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2010-03-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-03-11 — Assigned to lie
2010-03-15 — Law office publication review completed
2010-04-20 — Published for opposition
2010-04-20 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-06-15 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-01-17 — Application abandoned
2011-01-17 — Final status recorded
2011-01-18 — Application abandoned
2011-02-14 — Undeliverable mail - no action taken
Owner Information
Mind Fetish LLC
Brooklyn , NY
Mind Fetish LLC
Brooklyn , NY
Correspondent
QUINCY E RUSSELL MIND FETISH LLC 3RD FL 78 S ELLIOTT PL BROOKLYN, NY 11217
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-12-13
Status Date:
2011-01-17
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.