Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Fabrics ›
2008 ›
MA ›
MAMAREST
Trademark search for:
MAMAREST
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-10-15 — Application filed
2008-10-20 — Application filed
2008-10-21 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2009-01-15 — Final disposition recorded
2009-01-15 — Assigned to examiner
2009-01-16 — Final disposition recorded
2009-03-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
2009-03-20 — Office action issued
2009-03-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-03-23 — Assigned to lie
2009-03-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-04-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-04-13 — Law office publication review completed
2009-04-29 — Notice of publication
2009-05-19 — Published for opposition
2009-08-11 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-02-02 — Sou teas extension received
2010-02-02 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-02-02 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-07-15 — Sou teas extension received
2010-07-15 — Sou extension 2 filed
2010-07-15 — Sou extension 2 granted
2010-07-17 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2011-01-05 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
2011-01-05 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2011-02-08 — Registered-principal register
2017-09-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2017-09-15 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
MamaRest AB
Stockholm SE
MamaRest AB
Stockholm SE
MamaRest AB
Stockholm SE
Correspondent
Louis J. Levy Lerman Senter PLLC 2000 K Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, DC 20006-1809
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-10-15
Status Date:
2017-09-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.