Brandinium

Trademark search for:

SAFETGEAR

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2008-01-11 — Application filed
  • 2008-01-15 — Application filed
  • 2008-01-16 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2008-02-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2008-02-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2008-04-15 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-04-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-04-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-04-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-10-23 — Office action issued
  • 2008-11-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-11-05 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-11-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-11-28 — Suspension letter written
  • 2008-11-28 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-11-28 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-02-12 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2009-05-28 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2009-06-01 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2009-06-01 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-06-01 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-07-06 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-07-06 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2009-11-23 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2009-11-23 — Suspension letter written
  • 2009-11-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-11-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-11-24 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2010-05-03 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2010-05-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-05-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-05-20 — Suspension letter written
  • 2010-05-20 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2010-11-22 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2010-11-22 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2011-04-29 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2011-04-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-04-29 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-05-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-05-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-10-28 — Office action issued
  • 2011-11-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-11-08 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-11-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2011-11-16 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2011-11-30 — Notice of publication
  • 2011-12-20 — Published for opposition
  • 2012-02-14 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2012-07-27 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-07-27 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2012-07-27 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2012-07-31 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2013-01-25 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2013-01-25 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2013-02-13 — Teas post publication amendment received
  • 2013-02-13 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2013-02-14 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2013-02-15 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
  • 2013-03-26 — Registered-principal register
  • 2019-11-01 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2019-11-01 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

GRACIOUS LIVING CORPORATION
Woodbridge, Ontario CA
GRACIOUS LIVING CORPORATION
Woodbridge, Ontario CA
GRACIOUS LIVING CORPORATION
WOODBRDIGE, ONTARIO CA
Super Consumer Safety Ltd.
Markham CA

Correspondent

Andrew S. Ehard Merchant & Gould P.C.
P.O. Box 2910
Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-01-11
Status Date:
2019-11-01
Category:
Fabrics
Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.