Brandinium

Trademark search for:

UC ULTRACLUB

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2009-05-21 — Application filed
  • 2009-05-25 — Application filed
  • 2009-05-26 — Application filed
  • 2009-05-27 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2009-08-20 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-08-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-08-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-08-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-10-06 — Office action issued
  • 2009-10-06 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-10-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-10-16 — Office action issued
  • 2009-10-16 — Office action issued
  • 2009-10-16 — Office action issued
  • 2009-11-09 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-11-09 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-11-09 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-11-09 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-11-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-11-30 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-11-30 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-01-05 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-01-05 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-03-30 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-09-28 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2010-09-28 — Use amendment filed
  • 2010-10-18 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2010-10-18 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-11-01 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-11-01 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-11-01 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-01-10 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2011-01-10 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2011-01-11 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2011-02-15 — Registered-principal register
  • 2012-11-14 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received
  • 2012-11-14 — Withdrawal of attorney granted
  • 2012-12-14 — Paper received
  • 2013-01-04 — Review of correspondence complete - address updated
  • 2015-12-09 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2016-09-28 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2016-09-28 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2016-09-28 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2016-10-04 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2016-12-12 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2016-12-20 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 15
  • 2016-12-23 — Office action issued
  • 2017-01-03 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2017-01-03 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2017-02-16 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2017-02-16 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-02-15 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2021-09-17 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2021-09-17 — Final status recorded
  • 2025-03-27 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2025-03-27 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2025-03-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2025-03-27 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2025-03-27 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2025-03-27 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received

Owner Information

BRODER BROS., CO.
TREVOSE , PA
Bodek and Rhodes
Philadelphia , PA
Bodek and Rhodes
Philadelphia , PA
Bodek and Rhodes
Philadelphia , PA

Correspondent

Michael A. Marrero UB Greensfelder LLP
312 Walnut Street
Suite 1400
Cincinnati, OH 45202-4029

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-05-21
Status Date:
2021-09-17
Category:
Fabrics
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.