Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CRAFTHOLIC

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2011-12-15 — Application filed
  • 2012-02-02 — Sn assigned for sect 66a subseq desig from ib
  • 2012-02-03 — Application filed
  • 2012-02-07 — Application filed
  • 2012-03-24 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2012-03-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-03-27 — Office action issued
  • 2012-03-28 — Office action issued
  • 2012-03-28 — Office action issued
  • 2012-04-17 — Office action issued
  • 2012-09-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-09-13 — Office action issued
  • 2012-09-13 — Office action issued
  • 2012-09-13 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-09-21 — Assigned to lie
  • 2012-09-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-09-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-10-12 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2012-10-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2012-10-12 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-10-12 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-10-12 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2012-10-18 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2012-10-31 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2012-10-31 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2012-10-31 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
  • 2012-11-17 — New representative at ib received
  • 2012-11-20 — Published for opposition
  • 2012-11-20 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2012-11-29 — Opposition papers received at ttab
  • 2012-11-30 — Office action issued
  • 2012-11-30 — Office action issued
  • 2012-12-05 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
  • 2012-12-23 — Office action issued
  • 2012-12-23 — Notification processed by ib
  • 2013-03-14 — Paper received
  • 2013-04-09 — Ttab release case to trademarks
  • 2013-04-09 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
  • 2013-04-09 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
  • 2013-05-14 — Registered-principal register
  • 2013-08-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-08-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-08-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-09-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-05-14 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2018-11-21 — Teas section 71 & 15 received
  • 2019-01-09 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2019-01-15 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 71 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2019-01-15 — Registered - sec. 71 accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2020-10-15 — International registration renewed
  • 2020-10-16 — Change of name/address rec'd from ib
  • 2021-01-28 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-01-28 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
  • 2021-01-28 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2021-01-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-01-28 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2021-01-28 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2022-05-14 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (10-yr) e-mailed
  • 2023-12-01 — Cancelled section 71
  • 2023-12-01 — Final status recorded
  • 2024-08-02 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
  • 2024-08-08 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
  • 2024-08-08 — Invalidation processed
  • 2024-08-24 — Total invalidation processed by the ib

Owner Information

ACCENT CORPORATION
Tokyo JP
ACCENT CORPORATION
Tokyo 150-0011 JP
ACCENT CORPORATION
Tokyo 150-0011 JP

Correspondent

Tomoko Nakajima Cermak Nakajima & McGowan LLP
2000 Duke Street Suite 300
ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2011-12-15
Status Date:
2023-12-01
Category:
Fabrics
Filing Year:
2011

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.