Trademark search for:

AVIVAS-HIDALGO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2012-04-19 — Application filed
2012-04-23 — Application filed
2012-04-26 — Application filed
2012-08-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2012-08-04 — Assigned to examiner
2012-08-22 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2012-09-11 — Published for opposition
2012-09-11 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-11-06 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2013-05-06 — Sou teas extension received
2013-05-06 — Sou extension 1 filed
2013-05-06 — Sou extension 1 granted
2013-05-08 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-11-06 — Sou extension 2 filed
2013-12-09 — Application abandoned
2013-12-09 — Application abandoned
2014-02-07 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2014-02-07 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2014-02-07 — Petition to revive-granted
2014-02-07 — Teas petition to revive received
2014-03-14 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2014-03-17 — Sou extension 2 granted
2014-03-18 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-06-09 — Application abandoned
2014-06-09 — Application abandoned
2014-06-09 — Final status recorded
2015-03-17 — Teas change of correspondence received

Owner Information

creative ideas accessories &design LLC
medley , FL

creative ideas accessories &design LLC
medley , FL

Correspondent

SEVERINE GIANESE-PITTMAN ROBERT PITTMAN PA
100 N. BISCAYNE BLVD, SUITE 3070
MIAMI, FL 33132
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2012-04-19

Status Date:
2014-06-09

Category:
Fabrics

Filing Year:
2012

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.