Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Fabrics ›
2014 ›
PR ›
PRIMARKET
Trademark search for:
PRIMARKET
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2014-06-30 — Application filed
2014-07-03 — Application filed
2014-07-07 — Application filed
2014-07-08 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2014-08-04 — Assigned to examiner
2014-08-15 — Assigned to examiner
2014-08-20 — Final disposition recorded
2014-08-20 — Final disposition recorded
2014-08-20 — Final disposition recorded
2015-02-20 — Office action issued
2015-02-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-02-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-03-14 — Office action issued
2015-03-14 — Office action issued
2015-03-14 — Office action issued
2015-08-30 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2015-08-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-08-31 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-09-02 — Examiners amendment -written
2015-09-02 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2015-09-02 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2015-09-02 — Examiner's amendment entered
2015-09-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-09-28 — Assigned to lie
2015-09-30 — Law office publication review completed
2015-10-14 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2015-11-03 — Published for opposition
2015-11-03 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2015-12-29 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2016-06-27 — Sou teas extension received
2016-06-27 — Sou extension 1 filed
2016-06-27 — Sou extension 1 granted
2016-06-29 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2016-12-22 — Sou teas extension received
2016-12-22 — Sou extension 2 filed
2016-12-22 — Sou extension 2 granted
2016-12-24 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2017-06-19 — Sou teas extension received
2017-06-19 — Sou extension 3 filed
2017-06-19 — Sou extension 3 granted
2017-06-21 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2017-12-21 — Sou teas extension received
2017-12-21 — Sou extension 4 filed
2017-12-21 — Sou extension 4 granted
2017-12-23 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2018-06-19 — Sou teas extension received
2018-06-19 — Sou extension 5 filed
2018-06-21 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2018-06-21 — Sou extension 5 granted
2018-06-22 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2018-12-20 — Teas petition to amend basis received
2018-12-31 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2019-01-18 — Assigned to petition staff
2019-01-28 — Petition to director - change basis - granted
2019-01-29 — Case returned to examination
2019-02-13 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2019-03-05 — Published for opposition
2019-03-05 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2019-05-21 — Registered-principal register
2022-05-19 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2022-10-06 — Teas change of owner address received
2022-10-06 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2022-10-06 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2022-10-06 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
2022-10-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
2022-10-06 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2024-05-21 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2025-12-05 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2025-12-05 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
PRIMARK LIMITED
DUBLIN 1 IE
Primark Holdings
Dublin 1 IE
Primark Holdings
Dublin 1 IE
Primark Holdings
Dublin 1 IE
Correspondent
William C. Wright EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP 60 EAST 42ND STREET, SUITE 1250 New York, NY 10165 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2014-06-30
Status Date:
2025-12-05
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.