Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Fabrics ›
2014 ›
SA ›
SAGA VISION
Trademark search for:
SAGA VISION
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2014-12-08 — Application filed
2015-03-05 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2015-03-10 — Application filed
2015-03-14 — Application filed
2015-03-22 — Assigned to examiner
2015-03-24 — Final disposition recorded
2015-03-25 — Office action issued
2015-03-25 — Office action issued
2015-03-25 — Office action issued
2015-04-10 — Office action issued
2015-08-24 — Office action issued
2015-09-08 — Assigned to lie
2015-09-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-09-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-09-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-09-25 — Law office publication review completed
2015-10-14 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2015-11-03 — Published for opposition
2015-11-03 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2016-01-19 — Registered-principal register
2016-04-19 — Final disposition recorded
2016-04-21 — Final disposition recorded
2016-04-21 — Final disposition recorded
2016-08-12 — Final disposition recorded
2016-09-22 — Limitation of goods received from ib
2016-10-06 — Limitation from the ib examined, no action is needed
2017-03-10 — New representative at ib received
2018-09-14 — Limitation of goods received from ib
2018-10-05 — Correction under section 7 - processed
2018-10-05 — Limitation from the ib examined and entered
2019-03-01 — Limitation of goods received from ib
2019-03-05 — Limitation from the ib examined and entered
2019-03-11 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2019-03-11 — Correction under section 7 - processed
2019-11-11 — Partial invalidation of reg ext protection created
2019-12-11 — Invalidation reviewed - no action required by office
2020-03-06 — Limitation of goods received from ib
2020-04-20 — Assigned to paralegal
2020-04-20 — Correction under section 7 - processed
2020-04-20 — Limitation from the ib examined and entered
2020-06-30 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2020-06-30 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
2020-06-30 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2020-07-01 — Review of correspondence complete - address updated
2020-09-24 — Review of correspondence complete - certificate of reg mailed
2020-12-02 — Review of correspondence complete - certificate of reg mailed
2020-12-29 — Partial invalidation of reg ext protection created
2020-12-30 — Invalidation reviewed - no action required by office
2021-01-19 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (6-yr) e-mailed
2021-02-24 — Review of correspondence complete - certificate of reg mailed
2021-09-17 — Request for sect 7 total surrender filed
2021-09-17 — Teas section 7 surrender received
2021-11-18 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2021-11-19 — Cancelled section 7-total
2021-11-20 — Notice of cancellation sec. 7 surrender emailed
2021-12-31 — New representative at ib received
2022-07-19 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
2022-08-24 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
2022-08-24 — Invalidation processed
2022-09-20 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
2024-05-18 — New representative at ib received
2024-12-08 — Final status recorded
2025-07-04 — Death of international registration
2025-07-04 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed
Owner Information
Saga Furs Oyj
FI
Saga Furs Oyj
FI
Saga Furs Oyj
FI
Correspondent
Brewster Taylor STITES & HARBISON PLLC 1800 Diagonal Road Suite 325 Alexandria, VA 22314
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2014-12-08
Status Date:
2024-12-08
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.