Trademark search for:

BOUTON DE ROSE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2016-04-19 — Application filed
2016-11-17 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2016-11-22 — Application filed
2016-11-22 — Assigned to examiner
2016-11-26 — Application filed
2016-11-29 — Final disposition recorded
2016-11-30 — Office action issued
2016-12-07 — Office action issued
2016-12-07 — Office action issued
2016-12-24 — Office action issued
2017-05-05 — Assigned to examiner
2017-06-07 — Office action issued
2017-06-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-06-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-06-26 — Final disposition recorded
2017-06-26 — Final disposition recorded
2017-06-26 — Final disposition recorded
2017-09-01 — Office action issued
2018-01-22 — Application abandoned
2018-01-22 — Application abandoned
2018-01-22 — Final status recorded
2018-04-18 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2018-04-18 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2018-05-04 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2019-01-22 — Final disposition recorded
2019-01-22 — Final disposition recorded
2019-02-08 — Final disposition recorded
2020-07-03 — Limitation of goods received from ib
2020-08-06 — Limitation from the ib examined, no action is needed
2021-03-20 — New representative at ib received

Owner Information

NEO-CONCEPT (HOLDINGS) CO. LTD
CN

Correspondent

Mark Lebow 8T17691534
1700 Diagonal Road
Suite 505
Alexandria, VA 22314

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2016-04-19

Status Date:
2018-01-22

Category:
Fabrics

Filing Year:
2016

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.