Trademark search for:

SENSUAL SPA

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2016-06-15 — Application filed
2016-06-18 — Application filed
2016-06-21 — Application filed
2016-09-24 — Assigned to examiner
2016-09-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
2016-10-19 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2016-11-08 — Published for opposition
2016-11-08 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-01-03 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2017-01-19 — Teas statement of use received
2017-01-19 — Use amendment filed
2017-01-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-02-08 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2017-02-09 — Statement of use processing complete
2017-02-24 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2017-02-25 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2017-04-04 — Registered-principal register
2017-10-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
2018-01-10 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2018-01-10 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2019-04-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2019-04-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2022-04-04 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2023-10-20 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2023-10-20 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Ram, Dilip
Edison , NJ

Ram, Dilip
Edison , NJ

Ram, Dilip
Edison , NJ

Correspondent

Raj Abhyanker LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.
446 E Southern Ave
Tempe, AZ 85282
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2016-06-15

Status Date:
2023-10-20

Category:
Fabrics

Filing Year:
2016

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.