Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Firearms ›
2000 ›
KE ›
KEY CONCEPT
Trademark search for:
KEY CONCEPT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2000-01-12 — Application filed
2000-06-12 — Assigned to examiner
2000-06-15 — Assigned to examiner
2000-06-22 — Final disposition recorded
2000-09-08 — Assigned to examiner
2000-12-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-01-12 — Letter of suspension mailed
2002-07-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-08-23 — Paper received
2002-09-30 — Assigned to examiner
2002-10-11 — Letter of suspension mailed
2002-10-15 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
2002-10-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-10-22 — Letter of suspension mailed
2002-12-06 — Paper received
2002-12-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-12-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-02-12 — Notice of publication
2003-03-04 — Published for opposition
2003-05-27 — Registered-principal register
2006-11-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
2008-05-23 — Case file in ticrs
2009-11-27 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2009-12-08 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2009-12-08 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2014-01-03 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2014-01-03 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Sako Ltd
11100 RIIHIMAKI FI
Sako Ltd
11100 RIIHIMAKI FI
Sako Ltd
11100 RIIHIMAKI FI
Correspondent
MARK I. PEROFF Hiscock & Barclay, LLP Seven Times Square NEW YORK, NY 10036 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2000-01-12
Status Date:
2014-01-03
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.