Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Firearms ›
2006 ›
NA ›
NANODET
Trademark search for:
NANODET
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-05-11 — Application filed
2006-05-17 — Application filed
2006-05-18 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2006-08-14 — Assigned to examiner
2006-08-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-08-18 — Assigned to lie
2006-08-23 — Law office publication review completed
2006-09-20 — Notice of publication
2006-10-10 — Published for opposition
2007-01-02 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-06-29 — Sou teas extension received
2007-06-29 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-06-29 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-12-18 — Sou teas extension received
2007-12-18 — Sou extension 2 filed
2007-12-18 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-07-02 — Sou teas extension received
2008-07-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
2008-07-02 — Sou extension 3 filed
2008-07-02 — Sou extension 3 granted
2008-10-23 — Sou teas extension received
2008-10-23 — Sou extension 4 granted
2008-10-23 — Sou extension 4 filed
2009-06-29 — Sou teas extension received
2009-06-29 — Sou extension 5 filed
2009-07-22 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-07-22 — Sou extension 5 granted
2010-02-01 — Application abandoned
2010-02-01 — Application abandoned
2010-02-01 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Dyno Nobel Inc.
Salt Lake City , UT
Dyno Nobel Inc.
Salt Lake City , UT
Correspondent
Victor E. Libert Cantor Colburn LLP 20 Church Street 22nd Floor Hartford, CT 06103
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-05-11
Status Date:
2010-02-01
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.