Trademark search for:

DIAMOND CARPETS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1993-10-13 — Application filed
1994-02-18 — Assigned to examiner
1994-02-28 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1994-03-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
1994-04-29 — Notice of publication
1994-05-31 — Published for opposition
1994-08-23 — Registered-principal register
2000-08-21 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2000-12-08 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2004-09-14 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2004-09-14 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2004-11-04 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2004-11-04 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2005-09-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
2009-03-11 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2011-03-31 — Case file in ticrs
2011-05-09 — Case file in ticrs
2011-05-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
2011-05-25 — Teas change of owner address received
2011-05-25 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2016-02-26 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-02-26 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

MOHAWK CARPET DISTRIBUTION, INC
Chatsworth , GA

MOHAWK BRANDS, INC.
WILMINGTON , DE

MOHAWK CARPET CORPORATION
ATLANTA , GA

DIAMOND RUG & CARPET MILLS
Eton , GA

DIAMOND RUG & CARPET MILLS
Eton , GA

DIAMOND RUG & CARPET MILLS
Eton , GA

Correspondent

Joe Foye Mohawk
P.O. Box 800
Misty Young - Legal Dept
Chatsworth, GA 30705

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1993-10-13

Status Date:
2016-02-26

Category:
Floor Coverings

Filing Year:
1993

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.