Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CLICK! CAFE COFFEE.COMPUTERS.CHAT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2002-04-02 — Application filed
  • 2002-07-12 — Paper received
  • 2002-07-12 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
  • 2002-07-29 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-08-15 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2002-12-30 — Paper received
  • 2002-12-30 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
  • 2003-01-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-04-16 — Paper received
  • 2003-04-16 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-05-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2003-10-22 — Notice of publication
  • 2003-11-11 — Published for opposition
  • 2004-02-03 — Registered-principal register
  • 2007-06-08 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2008-01-16 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2008-10-01 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2009-02-19 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2009-02-23 — Assigned to paralegal
  • 2009-03-11 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2009-03-14 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2009-04-08 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2009-05-06 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2009-09-17 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2009-11-09 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2009-11-09 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2013-03-27 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2014-01-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2014-01-22 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2014-01-22 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2014-01-24 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2014-01-24 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2014-01-24 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
  • 2018-09-12 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2018-09-12 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-12-23 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-12-23 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2020-12-23 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-12-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-12-23 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2023-02-03 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2024-08-16 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2024-08-16 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

ARCHSTONE TRADEMARK JV, LLC
ARLINGTON , VA
ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES LLC
ENGLEWOOD , CO
ARCHSTONE
ENGLEWOOD , CO
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust, a Maryland trust, the trustees comprising R. Scott Sellers, J.A. Cardwell, John M. Richman, John C. Schweitzer, James H. Polk III, Ned S.Holmes, Robert H. Smith, Robert P. Kogod, and Ernest A. Gerardi, all U.S. citize
Englewood , CO
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust, a Maryland trust, the trustees comprising R. Scott Sellers, J.A. Cardwell, John M. Richman, John C. Schweitzer, James H. Polk III, Ned S.Holmes, Robert H. Smith, Robert P. Kogod, and Ernest A. Gerardi, all U.S. citize
Englewood , CO
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust, a Maryland trust, the trustees comprising R. Scott Sellers, J.A. Cardwell, John M. Richman, John C. Schweitzer, James H. Polk III, Ned S.Holmes, Robert H. Smith, Robert P. Kogod, and Ernest A. Gerardi, all U.S. citize
Englewood , CO

Correspondent

Brent D. Sokol Greenberg Traurig, LLP
1840 Century Park East, Suite 1900
Los Angeles, CA 90067
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2002-04-02
Status Date:
2024-08-16
Filing Year:
2002

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.