Brandinium

Trademark search for:

PANEZZINO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2006-04-13 — Application filed
  • 2006-04-19 — Application filed
  • 2006-04-20 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2006-09-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2006-09-21 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-09-22 — Assigned to lie
  • 2006-09-27 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2006-11-01 — Notice of publication
  • 2006-11-21 — Published for opposition
  • 2007-02-13 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2007-08-13 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2007-12-07 — Application abandoned
  • 2008-01-14 — Application abandoned
  • 2008-02-01 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2008-02-01 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2008-02-01 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2008-02-01 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2008-02-08 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2008-02-13 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2008-08-01 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2008-08-01 — Application abandoned
  • 2008-08-01 — Application abandoned
  • 2008-08-13 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2008-08-13 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2008-08-22 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2008-08-22 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2008-08-22 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2008-08-26 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2009-01-05 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2009-01-05 — Use amendment filed
  • 2009-01-07 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2009-03-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-03-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-03-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-11-03 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-11-03 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-12-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-12-28 — Office action issued
  • 2009-12-28 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2009-12-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-12-28 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2010-01-29 — Office action issued
  • 2010-01-29 — Office action issued
  • 2010-01-29 — Office action issued
  • 2010-09-25 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-09-27 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-11-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2010-11-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-11-26 — Office action issued
  • 2010-11-26 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2010-11-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-11-26 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2011-01-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-01-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-01-03 — Office action issued
  • 2011-04-15 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2011-04-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-04-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-05-19 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2011-06-03 — Assigned to lie
  • 2011-06-07 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2011-06-08 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2011-07-12 — Registered-principal register
  • 2016-07-12 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2018-02-16 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2018-02-16 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Predazzi-Florian Design, Inc.
Northridge , CA
Florian, Brandon Predazzi
Northridge , CA
Predazzi-Florian Design, Inc.
Northridge , CA
Florian, Brandon Predazzi
Northridge , CA
Predazzi-Florian Design, Inc.
Northridge , CA
Florian, Brandon Predazzi
Northridge , CA

Correspondent

Brandon Predazzi Florian
11348 Santini Lane
Northridge, CA 91326
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2006-04-13
Status Date:
2018-02-16
Filing Year:
2006

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.