Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Food & Drink Services ›
2007 ›
LA ›
LACOLINE
Trademark search for:
LACOLINE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-02-12 — Application filed
2007-02-15 — Application filed
2007-05-31 — Assigned to examiner
2007-06-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-06-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-07-06 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2007-07-06 — Assigned to lie
2007-07-06 — Law office publication review completed
2007-07-25 — Notice of publication
2007-08-14 — Published for opposition
2007-10-25 — Assigned to examiner
2007-11-06 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-05-06 — Sou extension 1 filed
2008-07-10 — Application abandoned
2008-07-10 — Application abandoned
2008-07-28 — Teas change of owner address received
2008-07-28 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2008-07-28 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2008-07-28 — Petition to revive-granted
2008-07-28 — Teas petition to revive received
2008-07-29 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-07-30 — Sou extension 1 granted
2008-09-15 — Teas change of correspondence received
2008-12-08 — Application abandoned
2008-12-08 — Application abandoned
2008-12-08 — Final status recorded
2009-03-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
Owner Information
SAMCHULLY AMERICA CORPORATION
Los Angeles , CA
SAMCHULLY AMERICA CORPORATION
IRVINE , CA
Correspondent
Ginam Lee Karacter Law Firm, APLC 3600 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1510 Los Angeles, CA 90010
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-02-12
Status Date:
2008-12-08
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.