Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Food & Drink Services ›
2008 ›
PI ›
PINKYO
Trademark search for:
PINKYO
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-08-21 — Application filed
2008-08-26 — Application filed
2008-08-27 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2008-12-01 — Assigned to examiner
2008-12-03 — Final disposition recorded
2008-12-03 — Final disposition recorded
2008-12-03 — Final disposition recorded
2009-04-30 — Office action issued
2009-04-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-05-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-05-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-05-04 — Assigned to lie
2009-05-04 — Assigned to lie
2009-05-05 — Law office publication review completed
2009-05-20 — Notice of publication
2009-06-09 — Published for opposition
2009-09-01 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-03-01 — Sou teas extension received
2010-03-01 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-03-30 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-03-31 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-04-01 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2010-10-04 — Application abandoned
2010-10-04 — Application abandoned
2010-10-04 — Final status recorded
2014-05-29 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2014-05-29 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
Owner Information
PINKBERRY, INC.
LOS ANGELES , CA
PINKBERRY, INC.
LOS ANGELES , CA
Correspondent
Christina Olesten Conkle & Olesten, PC 11835 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite 1235 Los Angeles, CA 90064 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-08-21
Status Date:
2010-10-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.