Brandinium

Trademark search for:

MAUI PIZZA COMPANY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2009-06-17 — Application filed
  • 2009-06-20 — Application filed
  • 2009-06-22 — Application filed
  • 2009-06-29 — Teas amendment entered before attorney assigned
  • 2009-06-29 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2009-09-16 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-09-18 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-09-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-09-18 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-09-18 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-09-18 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-09-30 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-09-30 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-11-03 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-11-03 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-01-26 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-03-24 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2010-03-24 — Teas request to divide received
  • 2010-03-24 — Use amendment filed
  • 2010-03-24 — Divisional request received
  • 2010-04-22 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-04-22 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2010-04-22 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2010-04-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-04-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-04-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-04-29 — Teas post publication amendment received
  • 2010-05-04 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2010-05-06 — Teas post publication amendment received
  • 2010-05-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-05-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-05-12 — Data modification completed
  • 2010-05-12 — Review of correspondence complete
  • 2010-05-18 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2010-05-18 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2010-05-19 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2010-06-22 — Registered-principal register
  • 2010-08-03 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2010-08-03 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2010-12-01 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2011-01-21 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2011-01-21 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2013-09-18 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2014-05-14 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2015-02-20 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2015-02-20 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2015-06-22 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2015-12-18 — Teas section 7 request received
  • 2016-01-05 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2016-01-11 — Amendment under section 7 - processed
  • 2016-02-04 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2016-04-02 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2016-04-02 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2016-04-02 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2016-09-14 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2019-06-22 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2021-01-29 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2021-01-29 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

DIAMOND RESORTS HOLDINGS, LLC
Las Vegas , NV
DIAMOND RESORTS HOLDINGS, LLC
LAS VEGAS , NV
DIAMOND RESORTS HOLDINGS, LLC
LAS VEGAS , NV

Correspondent

GREGG A. PARADISE LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ & ME
600 SOUTH AVENUE WEST
WESTFIELD, NJ 07090
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-06-17
Status Date:
2021-01-29
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.