Brandinium

Trademark search for:

TAKE-AWAY BUFFET

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2010-06-07 — Application filed
  • 2010-06-10 — Application filed
  • 2010-06-11 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2010-07-01 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-07-01 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
  • 2010-09-17 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2010-09-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-09-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-09-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-03-10 — Office action issued
  • 2011-03-17 — Assigned to lie
  • 2011-03-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-03-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-03-21 — Suspension letter written
  • 2011-03-21 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-03-21 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-07-11 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2011-07-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-07-11 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-07-27 — Suspension letter written
  • 2011-07-27 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-07-27 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-09-09 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2011-09-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-09-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-09-26 — Suspension letter written
  • 2011-09-26 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-09-26 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-03-23 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2012-03-24 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2012-03-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-03-24 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-03-24 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-03-24 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-03-24 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-09-18 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2012-09-18 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2012-09-24 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2012-10-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-10-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-10-03 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-10-03 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-10-03 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-04-03 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2013-04-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-04-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-04-05 — Suspension letter written
  • 2013-04-05 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-04-05 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-10-07 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2013-10-07 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2013-10-07 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-10-07 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-10-07 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2013-10-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-10-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-10-08 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-10-08 — Suspension letter written
  • 2013-10-08 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-04-08 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2014-04-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-04-11 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-04-13 — Suspension letter written
  • 2014-04-13 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-04-13 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-10-09 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2014-10-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-10-16 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-10-17 — Suspension letter written
  • 2014-10-17 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-10-17 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-04-16 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2015-04-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-04-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-04-23 — Suspension letter written
  • 2015-04-23 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-04-23 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-10-26 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2015-11-09 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-11-09 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-11-09 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2016-05-09 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2016-05-19 — Assigned to lie
  • 2016-05-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-05-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-06-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-06-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-06-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-06-15 — Office action issued
  • 2016-06-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-06-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-07-18 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2016-07-18 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2016-07-18 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2016-07-18 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2016-07-18 — Approved for registration supplemental register
  • 2016-07-18 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2016-08-23 — Registered-supplemental register
  • 2021-08-23 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2023-03-10 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2023-03-10 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Bernard Wilson
Port Credit, Ontario CA
Bernard Wilson
Port Credit, Ontario CA

Correspondent

Isabel Anne Stratton KEYSER MASON BALL LLP
4 ROBERT SPECK PARKWAY, SUITE 1600
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, L4Z1S1
CANADA

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2010-06-07
Status Date:
2023-03-10
Filing Year:
2010

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.