Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Food & Drink Services ›
2013 ›
AA ›
AANI & DANI CHOCOLATIER - 1998
Trademark search for:
AANI & DANI CHOCOLATIER - 1998
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2013-04-15 — Application filed
2013-04-18 — Application filed
2013-04-20 — Application filed
2013-04-23 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
2013-07-30 — Assigned to examiner
2013-08-06 — Final disposition recorded
2013-08-06 — Final disposition recorded
2013-08-06 — Final disposition recorded
2013-12-11 — Office action issued
2013-12-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-12-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-12-19 — Office action issued
2013-12-19 — Office action issued
2013-12-19 — Office action issued
2014-06-19 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2014-06-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
2014-06-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-06-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-08-13 — Examiners amendment -written
2014-08-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
2014-08-13 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2014-08-13 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2014-08-13 — Examiner's amendment entered
2014-08-21 — Assigned to lie
2014-08-26 — Law office publication review completed
2014-09-10 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2014-09-30 — Published for opposition
2014-09-30 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2014-11-25 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2015-05-26 — Sou teas extension received
2015-05-26 — Sou extension 1 filed
2015-05-26 — Sou extension 1 granted
2015-05-28 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2015-11-25 — Sou teas extension received
2015-11-25 — Sou extension 2 filed
2015-12-22 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2015-12-28 — Sou extension 2 granted
2015-12-29 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2016-05-25 — Sou teas extension received
2016-05-25 — Sou extension 3 filed
2016-06-28 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2016-06-29 — Sou extension 3 granted
2016-06-30 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2016-10-04 — Assigned to examiner
2016-11-25 — Sou teas extension received
2016-11-25 — Sou extension 4 filed
2016-12-01 — Sou extension 4 granted
2016-12-02 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2016-12-19 — Teas petition to amend basis received
2017-01-27 — Assigned to petition staff
2017-02-01 — Petition to director - change basis - granted
2017-02-01 — Attorney review/decision on amendment required
2017-02-08 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2017-02-22 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2017-03-14 — Published for opposition
2017-03-14 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-05-30 — Registered-principal register
2020-06-19 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2020-06-19 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
2020-06-19 — Teas change of owner address received
2020-06-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
2020-06-19 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2020-06-19 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2020-06-26 — Review of correspondence complete - address updated
2022-05-30 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2023-12-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2023-12-15 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Khalid Saleh Al- Othaim Trading Est.
Riyadh SA
Khalid Saleh Al- Othaim Trading Est.
Riyadh SA
Khalid Saleh Al- Othaim Trading Est.
Riyadh SA
Correspondent
Flavia Campbell DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC 1850 North Central Avenue, Suite 1400 PHOENIX, AZ 85004 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2013-04-15
Status Date:
2023-12-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.