Trademark search for:

QUICK PILAF

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1982-09-23 — Application filed
1983-07-14 — Assigned to examiner
1983-08-08 — Final disposition recorded
1984-01-20 — Correspondence received in law office
1984-02-22 — Examiners amendment mailed
1984-02-23 — Approved for registration supplemental register
1984-06-26 — Registered-supplemental register
1990-01-16 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) filed
1990-05-04 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2004-06-14 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2004-08-19 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2004-08-19 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2006-02-01 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2006-02-01 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2006-04-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-05-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
2009-04-08 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2009-04-08 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2011-03-10 — Case file in ticrs
2011-03-28 — Case file in ticrs
2013-01-30 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2016-03-25 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-03-25 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Fantastic Foods, Inc.
NAPA , CA

Fantastic Foods, Inc.
Novato , CA

Correspondent

David R. Josephs BARLOW, JOSEPHS & HOLMES, LTD.
BARLOW, JOSEPHS & HOLMES, LTD.
101 Dyer Street, 5th Floor
Providence, RI 02903

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1982-09-23

Status Date:
2016-03-25

Category:
Foods – Bakery & Confectionery

Filing Year:
1982

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.