Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Foods – Bakery & Confectionery ›
1997 ›
CH ›
CHOCAROME
Trademark search for:
CHOCAROME
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-10-20 — Application filed
2003-11-04 — Application filed
2004-05-19 — Assigned to examiner
2004-05-24 — Final disposition recorded
2004-10-25 — Office action issued
2004-10-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-10-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2004-12-05 — Office action issued
2004-12-06 — Office action issued
2005-06-01 — Office action issued
2005-06-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-06-06 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2005-06-06 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2005-06-06 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2005-06-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2005-09-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-09-09 — Assigned to lie
2005-09-13 — Law office publication review completed
2005-10-12 — Notice of publication
2005-11-01 — Published for opposition
2006-01-24 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-02-07 — Paper received
2006-04-07 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2006-07-25 — Final status recorded
2006-09-25 — Application abandoned
2006-09-25 — Application abandoned
2006-09-25 — Exparte appeal terminated
Owner Information
Barry Callebaut France
78250 Hardricourt FR
Barry Callebaut France
78250 Hardricourt FR
Correspondent
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB 666 3RD AVE 10TH FL NEW YORK, NY 10017 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-10-20
Status Date:
2006-07-25
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.