Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Foods – Bakery & Confectionery ›
2003 ›
CH ›
CHOCOLATE KETCHUP
Trademark search for:
CHOCOLATE KETCHUP
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-02-28 — Application filed
2003-08-15 — Assigned to examiner
2003-08-18 — Final disposition recorded
2004-02-18 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-02-23 — Paper received
2004-03-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-05-05 — Notice of publication
2004-05-25 — Published for opposition
2004-08-17 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-02-16 — Sou teas extension received
2005-02-16 — Sou extension 1 filed
2005-03-09 — Sou extension 1 granted
2005-08-17 — Sou teas extension received
2005-08-17 — Sou extension 2 filed
2005-08-23 — Sou extension 2 granted
2006-02-17 — Sou teas extension received
2006-02-17 — Sou extension 3 filed
2006-03-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-03-07 — Sou extension 3 granted
2006-06-19 — Use amendment filed
2006-06-19 — Paper received
2006-08-08 — Statement of use processing complete
2006-10-03 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2006-10-12 — Assigned to lie
2006-10-14 — Law office registration review completed
2006-11-21 — Registered-principal register
2013-06-28 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2013-06-28 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Zumbe, Albert
Geneva CH
Zumbe, Albert
Geneva CH
Zumbe, Albert
Geneva CH
Correspondent
BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP 224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600 CHICAGO, IL 60604 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-02-28
Status Date:
2013-06-28
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.