Brandinium

Trademark search for:

LA FAMOUS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2003-06-19 — Application filed
  • 2003-09-22 — Paper received
  • 2003-09-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-11-11 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2003-11-12 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2004-06-23 — Application abandoned
  • 2004-07-01 — Paper received
  • 2004-07-12 — Paper received
  • 2004-07-12 — Petition to revive-received
  • 2004-10-25 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2004-11-18 — Suspension letter written
  • 2004-11-18 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2005-09-22 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-04-21 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2006-04-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2006-05-17 — Assigned to lie
  • 2006-05-18 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2006-06-14 — Notice of publication
  • 2006-07-04 — Published for opposition
  • 2006-08-02 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2006-09-26 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2007-03-01 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2007-03-01 — Use amendment filed
  • 2007-03-19 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2007-06-20 — Review of correspondence complete
  • 2007-06-20 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2007-07-11 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2007-08-22 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-08-29 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-10-01 — Suspension letter written
  • 2007-10-01 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-10-01 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-10-01 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2007-11-21 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2007-12-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2007-12-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2008-02-05 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-02-06 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2008-05-01 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2008-07-08 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2008-07-08 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2008-07-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-07-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-07-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-07-30 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2009-01-12 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-01-12 — Office action issued
  • 2009-01-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-01-14 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-02-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-02-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-02-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-08-10 — Paper received
  • 2009-08-18 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2009-08-18 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-09-09 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2009-09-09 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2009-09-09 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-09-09 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-09-20 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2009-10-27 — Registered-principal register
  • 2016-06-03 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2016-06-03 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Trion Ventures I, L.P.
Dallas , TX
FLYBY CAPITAL, INC.
MISSION HILLS , KS
Trion Ventures I, L.P.
Dallas , TX
FLYBY CAPITAL, INC.
MISSION HILLS , KS
Matthew Headley Holdings, LLC
St. Louis , MO
Matthew Headley Holdings, LLC
St. Louis , MO

Correspondent

THOMAS E. ROSZAK
4420 MADISON AVENUE
KANSAS CITY, MO 64111
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2003-06-19
Status Date:
2016-06-03
Filing Year:
2003

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.