Brandinium

Trademark search for:

FITNESS FLAKES

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-09-20 — Application filed
  • 2004-09-27 — Application filed
  • 2005-04-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-04-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-04-20 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-06-14 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2005-06-15 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2005-06-15 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2005-06-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2005-07-01 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-07-01 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2005-09-21 — Notice of publication
  • 2005-10-11 — Published for opposition
  • 2006-01-03 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2006-02-17 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-06-21 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2006-06-21 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2006-06-21 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2006-12-19 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2006-12-19 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2007-02-24 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2007-06-27 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2007-06-27 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2007-09-10 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2007-12-17 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2007-12-17 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2008-01-14 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2008-06-02 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2008-06-02 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2008-06-06 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2008-11-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2008-11-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2008-12-23 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2008-12-23 — Use amendment filed
  • 2009-01-13 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2009-01-13 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2009-01-14 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2009-01-26 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2009-01-26 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-03-03 — Registered-principal register
  • 2010-03-31 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2010-03-31 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2011-07-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2013-11-12 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2013-11-12 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2013-12-17 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2013-12-17 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2014-10-23 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2014-11-03 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2014-11-05 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2014-11-05 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2015-08-25 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2015-08-25 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2016-07-20 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2016-08-18 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2016-08-18 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2017-03-25 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2017-03-25 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2018-03-03 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2018-10-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2019-10-04 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2019-10-04 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

TREEHOUSE PRIVATE BRANDS, INC.
Oak Brook , IL
Ralcorp Holdings, Inc.
Omaha , NE
Ralcorp Holdings, Inc.
St. Louis , MO
Ralcorp Holdings, Inc.
St. Louis , MO

Correspondent

Patricia Smart Smart & Bostjancich
53 West Jackson Boulevard
Suite 432
Chicago, IL 60604

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-09-20
Status Date:
2019-10-04
Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.