Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Foods – Bakery & Confectionery ›
2005 ›
DA ›
DANONNA
Trademark search for:
DANONNA
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-09-20 — Application filed
2005-09-26 — Application filed
2006-03-28 — Assigned to examiner
2006-03-28 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-03-31 — Assigned to lie
2006-04-04 — Law office publication review completed
2006-04-14 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2006-05-22 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2006-06-05 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-06-05 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-06-09 — Opposition papers received at ttab
2006-06-14 — Examiner's amendment mailed
2006-06-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-07-21 — Assigned to lie
2006-07-21 — Law office publication review completed
2006-08-23 — Notice of publication
2006-09-12 — Published for opposition
2006-09-20 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2006-09-20 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2007-01-22 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
2007-01-22 — Application abandoned
2007-01-22 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
2007-01-22 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2007-01-22 — Application abandoned
2007-01-22 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
CASADOCE INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO DE ALIMENTOS LTDA.
Jose Antonio Boso Catanduva, S.P. BR
CASADOCE INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO DE ALIMENTOS LTDA.
Jose Antonio Boso Catanduva, S.P. BR
Correspondent
THOMAS M GALGANO GALGANO & BURKE LLP 300 RABRO DR STE 135 HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-4256 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-09-20
Status Date:
2007-01-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.