Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Foods – Bakery & Confectionery ›
2005 ›
IN ›
INTENSIVE SHOCK
Trademark search for:
INTENSIVE SHOCK
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-01-03 — Application filed
2005-03-24 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2005-03-25 — Application filed
2005-08-03 — Assigned to examiner
2005-08-04 — Office action issued
2005-08-04 — Office action issued
2005-08-09 — Office action issued
2005-08-19 — Final disposition recorded
2005-08-25 — Office action issued
2006-02-09 — Paper received
2006-02-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-02-22 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-03-23 — Office action issued
2006-03-23 — Assigned to examiner
2006-03-24 — Office action issued
2006-08-24 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2006-08-24 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2006-09-07 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2006-10-24 — Application abandoned
2006-10-24 — Application abandoned
2007-10-25 — Final disposition recorded
2007-10-26 — Final disposition recorded
2007-11-16 — Final disposition recorded
2014-06-05 — New representative at ib received
2015-01-03 — Final status recorded
2015-07-31 — Death of international registration
2015-08-01 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg mailed
Owner Information
Ahold Coffee Company B.V.
NL-1507 CJ Zaandam NL
Correspondent
LAWRENCE ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB 666 3RD AVE NEW YORK, NY 10017 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-01-03
Status Date:
2015-01-03
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.