Brandinium

Trademark search for:

VL 1

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2005-02-04 — Application filed
  • 2005-05-12 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
  • 2005-05-13 — Application filed
  • 2005-05-18 — Limitation of goods/services from ib entered
  • 2005-09-01 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-09-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-09-09 — Office action issued
  • 2005-09-09 — Office action issued
  • 2005-09-30 — Office action issued
  • 2006-01-12 — Office action issued
  • 2006-01-12 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-01-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-02-16 — Office action issued
  • 2006-02-16 — Office action issued
  • 2006-07-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-07-11 — Office action issued
  • 2006-07-11 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-08-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2006-08-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-08-25 — Assigned to lie
  • 2006-08-30 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2006-09-27 — Notice of publication
  • 2006-10-12 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
  • 2006-10-12 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2006-10-17 — Published for opposition
  • 2006-10-27 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
  • 2006-11-09 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
  • 2007-01-02 — Registered-principal register
  • 2007-08-01 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-08-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-08-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-09-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-01-24 — Change of owner received from ib
  • 2012-12-21 — Teas section 71 received
  • 2013-01-15 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2013-01-15 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 71 - e-mailed
  • 2013-01-15 — Registered-sec.71 accepted
  • 2014-08-28 — Change of name/address rec'd from ib
  • 2015-04-02 — International registration renewed
  • 2015-09-17 — New representative at ib received
  • 2016-01-02 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (10-yr) e-mailed
  • 2016-01-15 — Teas withdrawal as domestic representative received
  • 2016-02-05 — Review of correspondence complete - information made of record
  • 2016-08-25 — New representative at ib received
  • 2016-12-20 — Teas section 71 received
  • 2017-05-15 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2017-05-16 — Registered-sec.71 accepted
  • 2017-05-16 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 71 - e-mailed
  • 2020-01-27 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-01-27 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-06-25 — New representative at ib received
  • 2024-05-07 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2024-05-07 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2024-05-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2024-05-07 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2024-05-07 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2024-05-07 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
  • 2025-02-04 — Final status recorded
  • 2025-08-29 — Death of international registration
  • 2025-08-29 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed

Owner Information

LAFFORT HOLDING
FR
LAFFORT OENOLOGIE
F-33270 FLOIRAC FR
LAFFORT OENOLOGIE
F-33270 FLOIRAC FR
LAFFORT OENOLOGIE
F-33270 FLOIRAC FR

Correspondent

Steven J. Solomon Tucker Ellis LLP
950 Main Avenue, Suite 1100
Cleveland, OH 44113
United States

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-02-04
Status Date:
2025-02-04
Filing Year:
2005

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.