Trademark search for:

HAUTE CHOCOLAT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2006-08-25 — Application filed
2006-08-31 — Application filed
2007-01-19 — Suspension letter written
2007-01-19 — Assigned to examiner
2007-01-19 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2007-07-26 — Suspension letter written
2007-07-26 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2007-07-26 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2007-09-04 — Paper received
2007-10-13 — Amendment from applicant entered
2007-10-13 — Assigned to lie
2007-10-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-11-06 — Examiners amendment -written
2007-11-06 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2007-11-06 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2007-11-06 — Examiner's amendment entered
2007-11-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-11-09 — Assigned to lie
2007-11-09 — Law office publication review completed
2007-11-28 — Notice of publication
2007-12-18 — Extension of time to oppose received
2007-12-18 — Published for opposition
2008-05-02 — Extension of time to oppose process - terminated
2008-06-10 — Registered-principal register
2012-04-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
2015-01-16 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2015-01-16 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Michel et Mere, Inc.
Denver , CO

Michel et Mere, Inc.
Denver , CO

Michel et Mere, Inc.
Denver , CO

Correspondent

THOMAS S. BIRNEY DORR, CARSON & BIRNEY, PC
5299 DTC Blvd., Suite 340
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2006-08-25

Status Date:
2015-01-16

Category:
Foods – Bakery & Confectionery

Filing Year:
2006

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.