Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Foods – Bakery & Confectionery ›
2008 ›
FL ›
FLATOUT SNACKOUT
Trademark search for:
FLATOUT SNACKOUT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-05-19 — Application filed
2008-05-22 — Application filed
2008-05-23 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2008-09-04 — Assigned to examiner
2008-09-09 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-09 — Final disposition recorded
2008-11-12 — Office action issued
2008-11-12 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-11-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-12-08 — Office action issued
2008-12-09 — Office action issued
2009-05-12 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2009-05-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-05-12 — Assigned to lie
2009-05-12 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-05-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-05-29 — Law office publication review completed
2009-06-17 — Notice of publication
2009-07-07 — Published for opposition
2009-09-29 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-03-03 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2010-03-26 — Sou teas extension received
2010-03-26 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-03-26 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-03-30 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2010-09-22 — Sou teas extension received
2010-09-22 — Sou extension 2 filed
2010-10-12 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-10-12 — Sou extension 2 granted
2010-10-13 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2011-03-02 — Assigned to examiner
2011-03-28 — Sou teas extension received
2011-03-28 — Sou extension 3 filed
2011-03-29 — Sou extension 3 granted
2011-03-30 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2011-08-09 — Sou teas extension received
2011-08-09 — Sou extension 4 filed
2011-08-12 — Sou extension 4 granted
2011-08-13 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2012-03-28 — Sou teas extension received
2012-03-28 — Sou extension 5 filed
2012-04-11 — Sou extension 5 granted
2012-04-12 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2012-09-29 — Use amendment filed
2012-10-01 — Teas statement of use received
2012-10-03 — Statement of use processing complete
2012-10-04 — Final disposition recorded
2012-10-04 — Final disposition recorded
2013-04-01 — Teas change of correspondence received
2013-04-01 — Office action issued
2013-04-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-04-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-04-04 — Office action issued
2013-04-04 — Office action issued
2013-04-04 — Office action issued
2013-05-16 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2013-05-28 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2013-05-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-05-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-06-03 — Law office registration review completed
2013-06-04 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2013-07-09 — Registered-principal register
2015-03-25 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2015-05-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2015-05-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2017-02-10 — Teas change of owner address received
2017-02-10 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2018-07-09 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2020-02-14 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2020-02-14 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
FLATOUT, INC.
Westerville , OH
FLATOUT, INC.
GREENWICH , CT
Pattco, Inc.
Saline , MI
Pattco, Inc.
Saline , MI
Correspondent
Brian J. Downey Barnes & Thornburg LLP 41 S. High Street Suite 3300 Columbus, OH 43215-6104
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-05-19
Status Date:
2020-02-14
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.