Brandinium

Trademark search for:

RAW ONE ENRICHING ORGANIC NUTRITIOUS WORLD LOVE HEART SOUL BODY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2009-11-19 — Application filed
  • 2009-11-27 — Application filed
  • 2009-12-01 — Application filed
  • 2010-02-25 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-02-25 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2010-02-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-03-02 — Office action issued
  • 2010-03-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-03-15 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-03-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-03-29 — Office action issued
  • 2010-03-30 — Office action issued
  • 2010-09-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-09-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-09-10 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2011-04-25 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-04-25 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-05-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2011-05-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-05-10 — Office action issued
  • 2011-05-10 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2011-05-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-05-10 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2011-06-21 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2011-06-21 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2011-06-21 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2011-06-21 — Assigned to lie
  • 2011-06-22 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2011-06-22 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2011-06-30 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2011-08-02 — Published for opposition
  • 2011-08-02 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2011-09-27 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2012-03-27 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2012-04-30 — Application abandoned
  • 2012-04-30 — Application abandoned
  • 2012-05-14 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
  • 2012-05-14 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2012-05-14 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2012-05-29 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2012-05-29 — New noa to issue
  • 2012-07-10 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2013-01-10 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2013-02-11 — Application abandoned
  • 2013-02-11 — Application abandoned
  • 2013-02-26 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2013-02-26 — Use amendment filed
  • 2013-02-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2013-02-26 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2013-02-26 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2013-02-26 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2013-02-27 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2013-02-27 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2013-02-27 — Notice of revival - mailed
  • 2013-02-28 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2013-03-01 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-03-01 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-03-18 — Paper received
  • 2013-03-21 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2013-03-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-04-05 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2013-04-05 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2013-04-05 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2013-04-05 — Su-examiner's amendment written
  • 2013-04-09 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2013-04-10 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use mailed
  • 2013-05-14 — Registered-principal register
  • 2019-12-20 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2019-12-20 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Sandesha One Corp.
Hollywood , FL
Sandesha One Corp.
Hollywood , FL
Sandesha One Corp.
Hollywood , FL

Correspondent

DION TAYLOR RAWONE FOOD
DION@RAWONEFOOD.COM
2011 Johnson St
HOLLYWOOD, FL 33020

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-11-19
Status Date:
2019-12-20
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.